Back to DRIVE
E

Pillar E · Royal Purple

Experiential

Built for live cohorts, not solo screens.

Experiential learning is the most-established pillar in DRIVE and the most-misapplied. The originating articulations from Dewey, Kolb, Lave and Wenger emphasise the social, situated, and consequential nature of learning. Much contemporary 'experiential' content fails the test: it is asynchronous, individual, and consequence-free, homework dressed up as experience.

The pedagogical question

How do we deliver experience that is genuinely social, situated, and consequential, fitting a real classroom slot?

Framework lineage

What each tradition contributes, and what MyEdMentor takes from it.

Dewey, Experience and Education

(Dewey, 1938)

Contribution

Dewey's 1938 articulation positions experience as the substance of education, with continuity (across experiences) and interaction (with other learners and contexts) as the two essential criteria.

In our sims

MyEdMentor sims are designed for cohort interaction (peer teams, shared decisions) and continuity (programmes of multi-week runs build on each other). A single solo run satisfies neither Dewey criterion.

Kolb, Experiential Learning Cycle

(Kolb, 1984)

Contribution

Kolb's cycle is the operational definition of experiential learning still cited as canonical across business, medical, and engineering education. Experience is the starting point, but it is not the whole cycle.

In our sims

Sims provide the concrete-experience stage; tutor-led debrief structures the reflective observation; templates support the abstract conceptualisation; the next run is active experimentation.

Lave & Wenger, Situated Learning and Communities of Practice

(Lave & Wenger, 1991)

Contribution

Lave and Wenger establish that knowledge is bound to its context and community, and that legitimate peripheral participation in a community of practice is how professionals actually learn.

In our sims

Team play in MyEdMentor is itself a community-of-practice structure: teams own decisions, defend them to peers, and develop shared vocabulary across a programme.

Vygotsky, Zone of Proximal Development

(Vygotsky, 1978)

Contribution

Vygotsky's ZPD describes the range of tasks a learner can complete with peer or tutor support but not alone, and identifies this zone as where learning happens fastest.

In our sims

Tutor controls turn pacing and difficulty in MyEdMentor sims. Volatility presets are explicitly designed so an inexperienced cohort can run at low volatility (in their ZPD) while an experienced one runs at shock volatility.

Boud, Cohen & Walker, Using Experience for Learning

(Boud, Cohen & Walker, 1993)

Contribution

Boud and colleagues argue that experience does not automatically produce learning, it must be deliberately structured with attention, anticipation, processing, and learning intention.

In our sims

Briefing materials before each sim cue learning intentions (attention + anticipation). Decision feedback is immediate (processing). Debrief and reflection extract the learning.

Synthesis

What MyEdMentor adds is constraint discipline. Most platforms claim experiential learning while delivering content that fails Dewey's criteria of continuity and interaction. DRIVE Experiential is operationalised by what is excluded: no PII, no solo screens, no asynchronous-only delivery. The result is experience that is recognisably what Dewey, Kolb, Lave, Wenger, Vygotsky and Boud meant.

How Experiential shows up in our sims

Team codes, shared 4-digit PINs, browser-only join, no app, no email, no Personally Identifiable Information. Cohorts in within 60 seconds. Tutor-paced turn control. Designed for 4–60 teams per session.

The other DRIVE pillars

← Back to the full DRIVE framework