Back to DRIVE
R

Pillar R · Intellectual Indigo

Reflective

The debrief IS the lesson, not an afterthought.

Reflection is the most established of the five DRIVE pillars and the one with the deepest pedagogical literature. From Dewey through Schön, Mezirow, Brookfield and the UK Professional Standards Framework, reflective practice is consistently named as the engine that converts experience into learning.

The pedagogical question

How do we make reflection a structured, assessable part of professional learning, not just a hopeful afterthought?

Framework lineage

What each tradition contributes, and what MyEdMentor takes from it.

Schön, reflection-in-action and reflection-on-action

(Schön, 1983, 1987)

Contribution

Schön distinguishes between reflection during action (improvising in the moment) and reflection on action (deliberating afterwards). Both are skills; both can be taught and assessed.

In our sims

MyEdMentor splits debrief into two passes: an in-the-moment journal entry per turn (reflection-in-action) and a structured post-run reflection (reflection-on-action) with peer comparison.

Kolb's Experiential Learning Cycle

(Kolb, 1984)

Contribution

Kolb isolates Reflective Observation as one of four cycle stages. The cycle is not complete until reflection has produced abstract conceptualisation that informs the next action.

In our sims

Reflection prompts in our debrief follow Kolb's progression: what did you observe → what does it mean → what do you do differently next time?

Mezirow, transformative learning

(Mezirow, 1991, 1997)

Contribution

Mezirow argues that adult learning is transformative only when students confront and revise their underlying frames of reference, a process driven by critical reflection on assumptions.

In our sims

Boardroom sims contain pre-set 'frame-of-reference' challenges: dilemmas designed to surface and test students' assumptions, with explicit debrief prompts asking what shifted.

Brookfield, critical reflection

(Brookfield, 1995, 2017)

Contribution

Brookfield's four critical lenses, autobiographical, learner, peer, theoretical, extend reflection beyond self-examination into structured peer and theoretical comparison.

In our sims

Group debrief uses Brookfield's lenses as prompts: how did your view compare to your peers, what would the theoretical literature say, and how does this connect to your own past decisions?

UKPSF V4, reflection on practice

(Advance HE, 2023)

Contribution

The UK Professional Standards Framework names reflection on professional practice as a core value (V4) for accredited higher-education teaching, required evidence for Advance HE Fellowship.

In our sims

Tutors using MyEdMentor for FHEA portfolio evidence can export reflection-aligned debrief artefacts (anonymised, no student PII) that map directly to UKPSF V4 evidence criteria.

Hattie, feedback as the highest-leverage factor

(Hattie, 2009)

Contribution

Hattie's meta-analysis of 800+ studies positions feedback loops as the single highest-effect-size factor in observable learning gains, and reflection is the mechanism that converts feedback into learning.

In our sims

Every decision in a MyEdMentor sim generates immediate feedback (KPI shift, advisor reaction, peer vote). Reflection journals scaffold the conversion from feedback received to learning retained.

Synthesis

What MyEdMentor adds to this lineage is mechanism. Reflection is structurally embedded: it is not an optional debrief at the end but a required, scaffolded, peer-comparable act after every decision. The Schön/Kolb cycle, the Mezirow frame challenge, and Brookfield's lenses are operationalised as in-product prompts rather than tutor improvisation.

How Reflective shows up in our sims

Reflection journals after each turn. Oral-defence prompts at the end of every run. Peer debrief panels for group sims. Tutors get scaffolded debrief questions per scenario.

The other DRIVE pillars

← Back to the full DRIVE framework